The Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce welcomes Mesriani Law Group’s Membership

No Comments

Santa Monica Chamber of CommerceThe Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce has welcomed the Mesriani Law Group in its roster of advocates. With the intention of further expanding its role in the community, the law firm has decided to become an official member of the Chamber mid-January this year.

Through the affiliation of Mesriani Law Group with the Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce, the former would have the opportunity to strengthen its partnership with local businesses, government, and community-based organizations in Santa Monica for the benefit of the development of the legal services sector in California.

High-caliber Los Angeles lawyers of Mesriani Law Group are very much accessible to efficiently and diligently help out victims of personal injury accidents and employment discrimination, as well as social security disability benefit claimants residing in Santa Monica.

Driver Who Hit the 12 – Year Old Girl Not Charged for Any Personal Injury Claims

No Comments

After a hit-and-run incident killed a 12-year old girl at a Southern California freeway, the vehicle driver, John Sullivan, was never charged with any personal injury claim nor was cited for it.

According to the California Highway Patrol, Sullivan hit the 12-year old Eunice Flores who was crossing the road to pick up clothes scattered on the freeway after the suitcase had fallen from the roof rack of the car she was riding.

The incident happened last Christmas at the State Route 60 in Mira Loma, California. Sullivan saw the girl crossing the road but it was too late for him to avoid the collision. His vehicle struck Flores which caused the girl’s death.

Sad to say but the driver, Sullivan was never ticketed nor arrested for any violation because he was not at fault. Instead, the girl was to blame for the accident because she illegally crossed the road.

Under the California Vehicle Code Section 21954, a pedestrian crossing the road not within the pedestrian lane or marked crosswalk shall give a right-of-way to all vehicles on the roadway. However, it also states that in this provision, drivers should still take some proper precaution for the safety of a pedestrian in the roadway.

In Sullivan’s case, probably it was too late for him to take some safety precaution since he doesn’t even have any chance of avoiding the girl when he saw her on the road.

Apparently, Sullivan doesn’t have any liability for the girl’s wrongful death. Now, the issue here is the reasoning of the 12-year-old girl’s adult guardian for allowing her cross the freeway filled with fast-moving vehicles, For sure, the girl was not alone riding the car and that she is with someone before the accident happened.

The negligence of the adult that was with the 12-year-old during the time of accident made the vehicle driver that struck her exempted for any personal injury charges and other offenses since it is the liability of the child’s guardian to protect and provide safety for the minor.

Drowsy Driver Survives Train Collision After His Vehicle is Severed

2 Comments

An elderly driver in Pacoima was lucky to emerge without a scratch after his vehicle was struck and severed by a crossing Union Pacific cargo train.

It was reported that the car and train collision occurred at 1:15 A.M. when the man fell asleep behind the wheel and stopped in the middle of the railroad tracks.

According to the Los Angeles Police Department Valley Traffic division, the elderly driver drove his Hyundai Sonata past the caution arm of the train tracks. The impact of the crash ripped the car in half and the rear-half, with the driver still inside spun 180 degrees.

The tracks underneath the train got bent and buckled all the way to Sylmar because of the percussion which caused of wave of force that bent the tracks.

While the man was lucky enough to escape unscathed even after his vehicle was cut in half, the authorities arrested him on suspicion of drunk driving.

continue reading…

$2.3 million Award to Dole Workers Dismissed by Judge

No Comments

In California, a Court of Appeals judge recently overturned a $2.3 million dollar verdict against food giant DOLE in a toxic tort lawsuit filed by six Nicaraguan men.

In her ruling, Judge Victoria G. Chaney found that fraud was allegedly perpetuated by American and Nicaraguan attorneys and had tainted the trial. It was based on 27 secret witnesses who claimed that the cases are an elaborate international scheme and that the attorneys recruited fake banana workers and manipulated medical test results to defraud the court and the company.

However, the attorney who represented the Nicaraguan men alleged that the witnesses presented by the defendant received cash payment and lavish treatment in return for testifying about the plaintiffs’ alleged fraud.

The cases which were dismissed are one of the many which claimed that DOLE’s continued use of the pesticide chemical dibromochloropropane, or DBCP caused sterility and other medical conditions. The case and verdict of Tellez vs. Dole Food Co, the first case tried in the US over the alleged toxic chemical injuries is also being appealed by DOLE.

Toxic tort cases are perhaps one of the most difficult personal injury lawsuits to litigate. Proving the connection between the exposure to a toxic chemical and a resulting injury or disease is as costly as it is challenging.

For one, the effects of the exposure to the toxic chemical can be varied and sometimes, it would take years before a worker exposed to DBCP or asbestos will find out that his health was adversely affected (sterility) or that he has mesothelioma. Further, it is very expensive to litigate toxic torts claims as not only is one oftentimes going against a huge company, you would also need to provide expert testimony from medical and scientific experts in your evidence.

However, despite the costs and challenges, one shouldn’t hesitate to pursue his toxic tort complaint. It is the duty of your company to keep its employees/workers from unsafe conditions and dangerous substances at work. Likewise, if the toxic tort is due to a harmful chemical substance in a product and the consumer was injured by it, the manufacturer shall be held liable for it.

A very important consideration you should be mindful of when pursuing a toxic tort claim is choosing the right lawyer for you. Choose a personal injury who is knowledgeable and well-versed in toxic torts cases as building a winning case would usually hinge on the legal counsel you would choose to represent you.