CDCR’s $4.4 Million Dispute may End in Binding Arbitration
Dec 22
Binding arbitration is used by parties in dispute to sort out their disagreements without having to go to courts and have a judge give a verdict on the case.
Arbitrators are impartial experts who would hear the case of parties in dispute and determine the fairest judgment that can be reached.
Once agreed upon by both parties, however, the arbitrator’s take on the case and the conditions that come with the resolution should and must be followed by all those involved.
In recent news involving the state, a Sacramento judge will soon decide whether the case brought by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation against prison officer’s union should be resolved by an arbitrator.
Judge Kevin Cohane took into consideration California Correctional Officers Peace Association’s claim that their disagreement with the state is contractual and so it should be heard by an arbitrator and not a judge.
The complaint is about paid leaves of union members while they are on leave to attend to matters concerning the union.
According to CDCR, the union owes the state around $4.4 million as a reimbursement for the pays and benefits they received while on leave. The amount is said to have accumulated over a five-year-period as the union only paid less than 5 percent of the outstanding charges.
In addition, CDCR also claims that the union doesn’t have a contract and so that they’ve violated the terms of the oral agreements made to extend the UPL deal agreed upon by both parties.









Recent Comments